Author: ericsanjuan (page 4 of 4)

In Philly suburbs, sewer systems are for sale, and citizens push back

Lisa Lilick and Carol Smith struggled to get fellow Conshohocken residents to pay attention to their campaign opposing the sale of the borough’s sewer system. Who wants to think about boring wastewater when there’s a pandemic going on?

Lilick said her online posts about sewer rates suddenly found an audience. A Facebook page was launched, local bloggers took note, a petition was organized, and yard signs went up. Scores of angry residents tuned in to borough Zoom meetings, worried that their elected officials were trying to pull a fast one.

Read the full article at the Philadelphia Inquirer.

Ten Reasons to Protect NJ Public Water

New Jersey has a strong tradition of government ownership and operation of water and sewer utilities that is well-worth protecting and preserving because the public benefits. 

1.     Affordability. The rates of public (government-owned) water and sewer utilities are significantly lower than the rates of investor-owned (corporation-owned) utilities. Rates cover operations and capital investment. There is no additional cost added to cover profit. These distinctions are especially important in communities where many people have low and moderate incomes or in communities that have severe impacts related to the COVID-19 pandemic.  

2.     Good Management. Well-run government utilities are the norm. Any community can ensure Its system quality by hiring skilled managers and operators and ensuring they have the fiscal resources they need to do their job. 

3.     Local control. The people of the community, through their mayors other locally elected and appointed officials, have a direct say over the government water or sewer utility. 

4.     Easy access to Leaders. Government utility governing bodies hold public meetings in the communities they serve. A citizen with a concern can go to any meeting or request any information under public records laws. When corporations and private equity firms are in charge, decisions about rates and service can be made at public utilities commissions in complicated and opaque proceedings, or board rooms that are far away or where the public is not admitted.  

5.     Local asset. The community owns the local asset not a group of shareholders around the country or around the world who don’t have any incentive to perform well.  

6.     Local jobs. Utilities that are government owned draw their employees from the town where they operate or nearby towns.  

7.     The Benefits Go to Ratepayers, Not Shareholders. Economies and efficiencies of operation that save money benefit the ratepayer and not the shareholder. When a government system saves money by saving electricity or replacing old equipment, the ratepayers are the most likely to benefit. The savings can either stabilize rates or can be invested in protecting water quality and keeping the system in shape. In a corporate utility, the savings may be used to increase dividends or support the price of shares.  

8.     Community Never Has to Buy Back its Own System. Communities that privatize and come to regret it face steep costs to buy back their systems or get out of long-term concession contracts. They are often stuck with expensive or poor-quality service.  

9.     Government Systems Help Support their Community. Local government culture is one of cooperation – there’s no “proprietary information” or “trade secrets.” Staff, equipment, and funds are often shared informally or through shared service agreements.  

10.  Government Water and Sewer Service is a Public Service. Water and sewer service is too important to trust to private concerns. Water and sewer service are public goods and should be managed by public servants.   

Egg Harbor City to decide soon whether to sell water and sewer systems

In recent years, municipalities in this state have been selling off their water and sewer systems.

Egg Harbor City will be the first municipality to consider making that move without having to convince residents to vote for it in a referendum.

Two-thirds of the nine-member Common Council will have to agree to the sale.

Read the full story at this link.

Private investment firm seeks partnership with Fayetteville Public Works Commission

The Fayetteville Public Works Commission provides electricity, sewer and water for about 114,000 customers. As the name implies, it is a publicly owned utility.

But recently, it’s caught the eye of a private investment firm, which has submitted a proposal to help manage the utility.

Read the full article at this link.

Utility asks out of non-disclosure agreement with Bernhard Capital

Bernhard Capital Partners, a private equity firm based in New Orleans, has offered a proposed “concession” arrangement involving the Fayetteville Public Works Commission. Under the agreement, the firm would pay potentially hundreds of millions to the City of Fayetteville for the rights to manage the utility and collect the revenue, for 30 years. The following statement was released on Saturday by the PWC board.

Read the full article here.

Op-Ed: Fayetteville should be cautious over private company’s big-bucks utilities offer

The Fayetteville Public Works Commission, which provides electricity, water and sewer for more than 114,000 people, bills itself as the “hometown utility.” 

That would no longer be fully true — at least for the next three decades — if the city of Fayetteville and its utility enter into an agreement with a company out of Baton Rogue, Louisiana. 

Read the full article here.

Edison residents deliver petition opposing plan to privatize water system

Joyce Ship-Freeman is fearful of big hikes in water and sewer rates if Edison’s mayor and council lease the public utilities to a private company, Suez North America.

“They say in the event of a catastrophe that can go as high up as 10%. So therefore the people that are making it on a fixed income, like I am, cannot afford any higher rates,” she said.

The deal would call for Edison leasing control and management of its sewer system and part of its drinking water system to Suez, who would borrow $811 million from the Wall Street equity firm KKR for 11% interest for 40 years and Edison getting a concession or down payment of $105 million.

Read the full article here.

‘Bad for Lexington.’ Mayor says bill backed by water company would raise rates

Lexington Mayor Linda Gorton this week blasted a state Senate bill backed by Kentucky American Water and other utility companies as “bad for Lexington” and “bad for our economy.”

Senate Bill 163 would allow investor-owned water and sewage companies such as Kentucky American Water to use a different type of calculation to value a water system it wants to acquire. Critics say the change would lead to higher purchase prices, which the water company would then pass on to customers in the form of higher rates.

Read the full article here.

NJ Voters Consider Water Privatization This Month

The question of whether to privatize water systems was on the ballot of three New Jersey towns this month.

“On Election Day, two small communities — Long Hill and High Bridge — posted victories for public water and sewers in the state of New Jersey, one of the most privatized states in the country,” reported Food and Water Watch, an advocacy group that favors public water.

“In Long Hill and High Bridge, the water and sewer systems need costly repairs to improve and maintain safe and healthy water. NJ American Water waged a months-long marketing campaign to promote their takeover in Long Hill, an approach that had the backing of the township council,” the report said.

Read the full article here.

Newer posts