Educational resources on the importance of public water utilities and how privatization damages communities.
Asking the right questions is the first step to prioritizing public control and the common good and avoiding decisions that we’ll regret for years or, even, decades to come.
A Guide To Understanding and Evaluating Infrastructure Public-Private Partnerships in the Water Sector
This guide aims to help advocates, policymakers, and other stakeholders better understand and analyze water infrastructure project proposals, contracts, and related legislation. It describes critical issues and includes a list of key questions stakeholders can raise to ensure that a given project advances the public good
Private equity investors are notoriously predatory and secretive. The last thing states and localities should be doing is making expensive, risky deals with shadowy private investors who often do more harm than good
It may not always be apparent, but shareholder primacy seems to have guided many of the activities of investor-owned utilities in New Jersey and around the country
Egg Harbor City (EHC) is selling its tiny water and sewer system to a corporate utility for an eye-popping $21.8 million, largesse being underwritten by the rest of the corporation’s two million New Jersey customers. What goes around comes around, though. EHC ratepayers will help underwrite the cost of the next acquisition, and the one after that, and the one after that.
Large corporations like Suez and American Water are aggressively targeting sewer systems for takeover. And in some cases, the public won’t even get a voice.
When corporations take control of public water systems, they put profit over people. Watch The Story of Water: Who Controls the Way We Drink? to see how cities across the United States are coming up with innovative ways to improve their systems and keep them out of corporate hands.
The Pennichuck Corporation, located in New Hampshire, U.S., provides a unique opportunity to explore the rare structural transition from investor-ownership to a government-shareholder model for a long-standing regional water utility.
Proponents of privatization consistently argue that it saves costs due to competitive pressures private providers face to be more efficient. Over the last four decades there has been considerable experimentation with privatization. Results are inconsistent. Some cases find savings; others do not.